“Sociable” is the newest commentary on necessary social media developments and trends from industry expert Andrew Hutchinson of Social Media Today.
Let’s be clear: X cannot sustain a long-running advertiser boycott.
Over the weekend, various big-name advertisers announced that they might be halting their ad campaigns on X on account of third-party reports which suggest that X is failing to offer adequate brand safety, together with Elon Musk’s own commentary on political issues.
The former relates specifically to a report from Media Matters, which found that X’s ad system is running ads alongside racist, neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic content, in various forms, which X claims it has systems to forestall. X’s creator ad revenue share program could even be facilitating the monetization of such material, essentially incentivizing users to post divisive, harmful posts.
Musk’s own commentary, meanwhile, last week included overt praise of a well known antisemitic conspiracy theory, which, for a lot of, was seemingly the ultimate straw for his or her time, and money, within the app.
As a results of this, a few of X’s biggest ad partners, including Sony Pictures, NBCUniversal, Paramount, Warner Brothers, Discovery, Disney, Apple, and Lionsgate announced that they’re pausing their spending on the platform.
Some have even gone further, with ESPN, a subsidiary of Disney, even suspending their entire posting process, with all of ESPN’s X handles going dark on Saturday. Which will undoubtedly have an effect on X engagement, as sports stays a key focus for the app, with X reporting earlier this yr that 42% of its users are sports fans.
X’s troubles have also effectively given Meta a free kick, with many users turning to Threads as an alternative. But the continuing impacts for X on this are much more significant.
As an example, Apple alone reportedly spent $100 million on X ads in 2022. X’s ad revenue, meanwhile, had already been cut in half year-over-year, on account of broader concerns across the direction of the platform under Musk, and hesitations from brands. Which implies that X, before this latest boycott, had likely been on target to usher in around $2 billion in annual ad revenue for the yr, based on the platform’s 2022 performance.
It’s secure to assume, then, that when factoring within the combined spend of those other big spenders, the general impact here will likely be significant, potentially cutting one other 25% off of X’s annual total. That’s much more relevant given the timing, with the vacation push elevating ad spend in the ultimate months.
Of course, X does produce other revenue streams, like subscriptions and API charges. But they’re not anywhere near replacing such a major loss.
Based on the newest estimates, X’s subscription and data sales are actually on pace to generate around $600 million per yr for the corporate, which is a major alternative income stream. But it’s still a marginal element compared to its most important ads business.
And if this is compounded over time, the losses will stack up very quick, which could indeed make X an unviable business based on operating costs, together with the extra debt that Musk saddled the corporate with as a part of his acquisition funding.
At a rough estimate, X’s operating costs are currently between $2 billion and $2.8 billion each year, while Elon’s additional debt load will add an additional $1.5 billion a yr to that total.
So income before this incident was trying to be around $2.6 billion, versus outgoings of $3.5 billion.
As you’ll be able to see, even before this latest issue, X was taking a look at posting a major loss, and that’s despite all of its cost-cutting efforts. And this probably doesn’t think about the extra costs of GPUs and other systems required to power XAI’s latest “Grok” chatbot, one other of Elon’s pet projects.
Essentially, X was already staring down a billion-dollar annual loss, and now, it is definitely headed in that direction. And if it might’t right the ship, and get those top ad spenders back, quickly, it’s hard to see how X can recuperate from this latest hit, especially when you furthermore may think about the regular flow of users away from the app.
So what should X do?
Well, the regular corporate playbook would dictate that Elon should apologize for any hurt that his comments could have caused, and attribute such to a misinterpretation, or a misunderstanding on his part.
Nope, that’s not the trail that Elon’s taking.
Instead of acknowledging that his comments could have been ill-conceived, Musk has gone on the attack, reiterating that he is on no account racist, because all of his friends say that he’s not, while also, inexplicably, branding X’s key ad partners as “oppressors of free speech.”
So he’s essentially saying that his major ad partners, who make up 70% of X’s revenue intake, try to make use of their power to silence users.
Probably not the best strategy to endear himself to people who pay the bills.
In addition, Musk has promised that a “thermonuclear lawsuit” is within the pipeline for Media Matters, whom he claims have fabricated their evidence that X is displaying ads alongside potentially offensive content.
According to Musk, Media Matters cheated the system, by creating fake profiles, then repeatedly refreshing the timeline till ads from major firms were displayed alongside offensive content.
Which would still be a legitimate strategy to prove that this is possible under X’s current system, but Musk and Co. say that this is disingenuous, and never indicative of the speed of failure in its system. Which I’m unsure was the purpose, but that’s what Elon and Co. are going with.
Musk has also amplified posts which claim that Media Matters may very well have fabricated screenshots to make their claims, while he’s also labeled the organization as “evil incarnate” in response to their reporting.
It’s price noting here that Elon also threatened similar legal motion against the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in September, after it also produced a report which suggested that anti-Semitic posts were more prevalent within the app under Musk, while he also launched legal motion against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in August after its research suggested that X had “systematically didn’t remove anti-Semitic, anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim content.”
So this is just about Elon’s mode of operation, which does appear to run counter to his own “free speech” ethos.
Free speech, as long as you’re not criticizing Elon or his firms, apparently.
In any event, X’s approach is principally the alternative of the conventional corporate strategy, which might more likely have seen X acknowledging such issues and searching to work with these groups to enhance its systems.
Because Musk’s own view on what should and shouldn’t be allowed to be posted online is different to most. Elon’s view is that the most effective strategy to address divisive issues is to permit everyone to say whatever they think, regardless of how offensive, incorrect, or misguided it might be, then we will all have it out within the comments, and are available to a greater understanding based on more open-minded debate.
But history suggests that this is not how the web works.
Musk himself is also amplifying such claims to an audience of 160 million people via his own profile. Elon has long failed to grasp the implications of his massive following, and the burden that his words carry on this respect. That was true in 2018, when Musk labeled a British cave diver a pedophile for no reason, apart from he’d pushed back on Elon’s offer of assistance in a rescue situation.
Musk saw absolutely no problem with this, regardless that this man has been unfairly smeared with the suggestion ever since.
When Elon says something, it stands out, people listen, and that has an impact. Elon knows this, yet seems completely satisfied to be willfully blind to such in relation to things he desires to comment on.
Which is why X is now in trouble, though again, Elon is trying to use the specter of legal motion, and his vast resources, to quash critics.
Which has also been his mode of operation at Tesla, and SpaceX as well, working to discredit and crush critics in the event that they dare to oppose his plans.
The problem on this case is that advertisers don’t need to use his platform. X is not an important tool for any brand, and is becoming less relevant each time he posts one other controversial opinion, which drives more users to alternative apps.
And if these big-name brands don’t resume spending once again, and in the event that they go to the following step, like ESPN, and stop posting entirely, Elon’s X project might be over before it even really begins.
And as noted, the margins for error are much thinner than it could seem.
Threatening legal motion may prompt some to take pause of their critiques, but with an ongoing stream of reports suggesting that X’s approach isn’t working, it looks like X, and Musk, can be higher placed acknowledging potential flaws, somewhat than picking fights in public.
But, as Elon says, X is never boring. And he seems determined to maintain it that way, even when it leads to meaning tanking the business because of this.
Read the total article here